Mar 25, 2026

Budget 2026: Winners and Losers

Hits and misses from Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe and Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers’ Budget presentation to the Dáil on October 7th 2025

Felicia Zhou Staff Writer

The projected total of €9.4 billion in government spending and Ireland’s cautiously optimistic financial headroom, with the economy set to grow by 3 per cent in 2025 and 2026, is exceptional in contrast to many of its neighbours, according to Taylor Wessing LLP. However, the bulk of public finances appears to be commissioned in the direction of the nation’s largest-ever capital investment drive rather than cost-of-living relief measures, which have defined previous years.

At a Glance 

The clear winners in Budget 2026 surely reside in Ireland’s prosperous commercial and corporate landscape. The Research and Development tax credit has been boosted to 35 per cent, a move conceivably aimed at keeping Ireland attractive for foreign multinational corporations, whilst small- and medium-sized enterprises or start-ups can now enjoy a stamp duty exemption if their market capitalisation is below €1 billion, encouraging homegrown entrepreneurship. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Infrastructure and housing, two of the country’s most salient issues, have received a cash windfall. The former will undergo a transformation, receiving €4.7 billion for projects like the MetroLink and the Cork Area Commuter Rail Service. The latter was allocated €5 billion to deliver urgently needed homes, alongside palpable measures such as the freezing of the €1000 rent tax credit until the end of 2028 and reduction of the Value Added Tax (VAT) rate on the sale of apartments, policies designed to aid tenants and developers alike.

Welfare expenditure, typical of recent years, is high, but measures are arguably beneficial for a narrower section of society than is the norm. Low-income earners, pensioners, and minimum-wage workers will see relief as all social welfare payments have been increased by 10 per week and the national minimum wage increases to €14.15 per hour. Paired with tweaks to Universal Social Charge (USC) bands, despite the expected standstill in personal income tax rates, these steps can be taken as modest relief for struggling workers, including students and young people in part-time jobs.

Yet, the benefits are unevenly distributed, leaving plenty who lose out. Some students and their families will no doubt feel hard done by, given the net increase of college fees compared with the €1,000 temporary reductions of the past three years, despite a permanent decrease of €500. A similar story can be told of households that relied on the one-off energy credits distributed in the past, and middle-income households who also see limited benefits, converging to set the scene for a harsh winter as the economy stabilises, but rents and daily expenses remain high, this time without the contingency of small supplements and temporary support.

Emergency to Endurance

General consensus on Budget 2026 understands it to be a stark departure from its 2025 predecessor, which was formulated on the dawn of a general election, thus focused on mobilising the vote in favour of the sitting coalition through generous welfare giveaways. The paradigm has clearly shifted to a goal of presenting the government of the day as a responsible steward of public finances. This restrained, pro-business announcement is typical of the first after an election, reflected across the Irish Sea in Westminster, as governments have the temporal bandwidth to resist disquiet from citizens in the hopes of delivering for them in the long term, justified in Donohoe’s aim for “a sensible budget that will safeguard our future”. 

Notable Reactions

It will not come as a surprise that businesses have been broadly welcoming and receptive to the government’s proposals. Real estate giant, Savills Ireland, said the new housing policy “gives developers and funders the certainty needed to move forward”, whilst Camilla Cullinane of KPMG appeared largely satisfied in conversation with RTÉ, suggesting that measures to court multinational corporations were fruitful. Regardless,  the doubts expressed by financial custodians such as the Bank of Ireland and RSM that spending was not controlled enough will ring alarm bells. 

Foreseeably, opposition parties issued a blistering indictment of the Budget. Sinn Féin’s Finance Spokesperson Pearse Doherty TD’s statement that “I have never seen election promises abandoned so fast and so completely” has already been quoted in multiple outlets, in reference to the absence of cost-of-living reliefs. The party’s alternative Budget, “Ending the Rip-Off”, prioritised an expansionary plan of €450 energy credits, cuts to USC, free or reduced college fees, and a much bigger social and housing push over incentives to businesses. Similarly, Labour’s proposal also weighed heavily towards social investment and public services, and the Deputy Leader of the Social Democrats, Cian O’Callaghan TD termed the package the “McBudget”, citing the rewards to multinational corporations at the expense of working people.

The Corporate Tax Question

As the government comes under fire for appeasing multinational corporations, the structural deficiency that explains this obligation remains underaddressed. Irish public finances are arguably too sensitive to corporate tax receipts, which means undue influence lies with the ten companies that contributed over half of it in 2024. Along with luring finances away from the people, this reliance also runs the immutable risk of being “potentially transient”, as warned by the Department of Finance. This exposure proves unsustainable when assessing the risks of volatility in profits and the market, as well as the possibility of global tax reforms and increasing political uncertainty, which could see Ireland faced with tariffs to combat. 

Verdict 

From an optimistic vantage point, Budget 2026 can be taken as politically defensible and fiscally prudent. It indeed attempts to create stability, but it is difficult to justify whether the policies will steady ordinary people rather than merely steady the image of the government. Economists have long warned of a “two-speed economy” – a buoyant corporate sector dichotomous to a stretched domestic one. For all its restraint and ambition, the parcel offered does little to rebalance that equation.

Sign Up to Our Weekly Newsletters

Get The University Times into your inbox twice a week.